Supports 2nd Amendment, with stricter gun law enforcement
Q: I’d like to hear the senator’s position on Second Amendment rights. A: When it comes to expressed constitutional provisions like the Second Amendment, you’ve got to be very loathe to try and change that provision by mere statute.
So I am a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights. [But] people are being killed in our society today because they’re not enforcing the law. We have got too many guns in the streets, in the hands criminals.
Source: Republican Debate at Dartmouth College
Oct 29, 1999
Mental health check as part of background check
Orrin Hatch said evidence of mental health problems should be part of the instant background check made when purchasing a gun. Hatch said: “We need to keep better records. Mental health problems that indicate violent behavior ought to be part of the
instant check system.” He said that doesn’t solve the problem of gun use by the mentally imbalanced, and “the media has to show some restraint” in reporting on incidents of gun violence so there aren’t so many “copy-cat” crimes.
Source: David Yepsin, Des Moines Register
Sep 19, 1999
Gun violence problems can be solved by more enforcement
Hatch said the nation’s approach to gun violence has to be the same as it is toward the crime of kidnapping. After the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby in 1932, the nation cracked down on the crime with tough laws & considerable law enforcement efforts.
As a result, kidnapping is not a common offense today. “The way to solve this problem is to enforce the gun laws on the books and this administration has been singularly bad at this,” he said.
Source: David Yepsin, Des Moines Register
Sep 19, 1999
Trigger locks, gun show restrictions, import restrictions
Hatch was the author of the juvenile crime bill passed by the US Senate in May. Among other things, it would require trigger locks on all new handguns and impose tougher restrictions on sales at gun shows. The measure also would ban import of
high-capacity ammunition clips and any juvenile convicted of a felony would be denied the right to purchase a gun for life.
Source: Associated Press
Aug 13, 1999
Guns should be sold with safety devices
Hatch [co-sponsored a bill] aimed at protecting children by requiring that guns be sold with a proper storage or gun safety device. “Tragedies such as the shooting in Littleton remind us of the importance of parental responsibility & the need for
involvement in our children’s lives,” Hatch said. “By requiring that all handguns be sold with safety devices, we will reinforce responsible handgun safety practices. No minor should ever be able to obtain unsupervised or unauthorized access to a handgun
Source: senate.gov/~hatch “Press Release”
May 14, 1999
Enforce existing gun laws & extend them to juveniles
When a teen brings a gun to school, he should be held accountable by the criminal justice system. I support extending the Youth Handgun Safety Act to semi-automatic rifles, and prohibiting firearms possession by violent juvenile offenders. We should not
rush to enact more gun control without taking steps to insure that existing federal laws are being enforced. [We should] prosecute violent gun offenders and provide needed funding to build detention facilities for violent & recidivist juvenile offenders.
Source: senate.gov/~hatch/ “Juvenile Offender Act”
May 11, 1999
Enforce existing gun laws & extend them to juveniles
When a teen brings a gun to school, he should be held accountable by the criminal justice system. I support extending the Youth Handgun Safety Act to semi-automatic rifles, and prohibiting firearms possession by violent juvenile offenders. We should not
rush to enact more gun control without taking steps to insure that existing federal laws are being enforced. [We should] prosecute violent gun offenders and provide needed funding to build detention facilities for violent & recidivist juvenile offenders.
Source: (Xref from Gun Control) senate.gov/~hatch/ “Juvenile”
May 11, 1999
Prosecute gun crimes federally & severely
I do not support gun control, but I do believe in crime control. [Our proposed bill encourages] prosecution of as many local gun-related crimes in federal court as possible to take advantage of federal mandatory minimum sentences and stiff bond rules.
This provision does not create additional federal crimes, but instead utilizes existing federal statutes. [We propose] an extensive media campaign to promote the message to potential criminals that “an illegal gun will get you 5 years in federal prison.”
Voted YES on prohibiting foreign & UN aid that restricts US gun ownership.
Amendment SA 2774 to H.R. 2764, the Department of State's International Aid bill: To prohibit the use of funds by international organizations, agencies, and entities (including the United Nations) that require the registration of, or taxes guns owned by citizens of the United States.
Proponents support voting YES because:
Sen. VITTER: This is a straight funding limitation amendment. Many folks who haven't followed the proceedings on this in the U.N. may ask: What is this all about? Unfortunately, it is about an effort in the United Nations to bring gun control to various countries through that international organization. Unfortunately, that has been an ongoing effort which poses a real threat, back to 1995. In 2001, the UN General Assembly adopted a program of action designed to infringe on second amendment rights.
The Vitter amendment simply says we are not going to support any international organization that requires a registration of US citizens' guns or taxes US citizens' guns. If other folks in this Chamber think that is not happening, that it is never going to happen, my reply is simple and straightforward: Great, then this language has no effect. It is no harm to pass it as a failsafe. It has no impact. But, in fact, related efforts have been going on in the U.N. since at least 1995. I hope this can get very wide, bipartisan support, and I urge all my colleagues to support this very fundamental, straightforward amendment.
No opponents spoke against the bill.
Reference: Vitter Amendment to State Dept. Appropriations Bill;
Bill S.Amdt. 2774 to H.R. 2764
; vote number 2007-321
on Sep 6, 2007
Voted YES on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers.
A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. Voting YES would:
Exempt lawsuits brought against individuals who knowingly transfer a firearm that will be used to commit a violent or drug-trafficking crime
Exempt lawsuits against actions that result in death, physical injury or property damage due solely to a product defect
Call for the dismissal of all qualified civil liability actions pending on the date of enactment by the court in which the action was brought
Prohibit the manufacture, import, sale or delivery of armor piercing ammunition, and sets a minimum prison term of 15 years for violations
Require all licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers who engage in the transfer of handguns to provide secure gun storage or safety devices
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act;
Bill S 397
; vote number 2005-219
on Jul 29, 2005
Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence.
Vote to pass a bill that would block certain civil lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of firearms and ammunition, mainly those lawsuits aimed at making them liable for gun violence. In this bill, trade groups would also be protected The bill would call for the dismissal of pending lawsuits against the gun industry. The exception would be lawsuits regarding a defect in a weapon or ammunition. It also would provide a 10-year reauthorization of the assault weapons ban which is set to expire in September 2004. The bill would increase the penalties for gun-related violent or drug trafficking crimes which have not resulted in death, to a minimum of 15 years imprisonment. The bill calls for criminal background checks on all firearm transactions at gun shows where at least 75 guns are sold. Exemptions would be made available for dealers selling guns from their homes as well as members-only gun swaps and meets carried out by nonprofit hunting clubs.
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act;
Bill S.1805/H.R.1036
; vote number 2004-30
on Mar 2, 2004
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows.
Require background checks on all firearm sales at gun shows.
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)50; N)50; VP decided YES
Reference: Lautenberg Amdt #362;
Bill S. 254
; vote number 1999-134
on May 20, 1999
Voted YES on more penalties for gun & drug violations.
The Hatch amdt would increase mandatory penalties for the illegal transfer or use of firearms, fund additional drug case prosecutors, and require background check on purchasers at gun shows. [A YES vote supports stricter penalties].
Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)48; N)47; NV)5
Reference: Hatch Amendment #344;
Bill S. 254
; vote number 1999-118
on May 14, 1999
Voted YES on loosening license & background checks at gun shows.
Vote to table or kill a motion to require that all gun sales at gun shows be completed by federally licensed gun dealers. Also requires background checks to be completed on buyers and requires gun show promoters to register with the Treasury.
Reference:
Bill S.254
; vote number 1999-111
on May 11, 1999
Voted YES on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks.
Vote to table [kill] an amendment to make it unlawful for gun dealers to sell handguns without providing trigger locks. Violation of the law would result in civil penalties, such as suspension or revocation of the dealer's license, or a fine.
Reference:
Bill S 2260
; vote number 1998-216
on Jul 21, 1998
Ban gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC.
Hatch co-sponsored banning gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC
Nothing in any provision of law shall authorize the Mayor, or any governmental authority of the District of Columbia, to prohibit possessing firearms by a person who is allowed to possess firearms under federal law.
Denies the District any authority to enact laws or regulations that discourage or eliminate the private ownership or use of firearms.
Repeals the ban on semiautomatic weapons.
Repeals the District's registration requirement for possession of firearms.
Repeals the trigger lock law.
Maintains the current ban on the possession and control of a sawed-off shotgun, machine gun, or short-barreled rifle.
Eliminates criminal penalties for possessing an unregistered firearm.
Specifies exceptions to the prohibition against carrying concealed weapons in the District.
Source: D.C. Personal Protection Act (H.R.1399/S.1001) 2007-S1001 on Mar 27, 2007
Allow firearms in National Parks.
Hatch co-sponsored allowing firearms in National Parks
Bars the promulgation or enforcement of any regulation that prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm, including an assembled or functional firearm, in any unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System if:
the individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm; and
the possession of the firearm is in compliance with the law of state in which the unit is located.
Source: Protecting Americans from Violent Crime Act (S.2619&HR.5434) 2008-S2619 on Feb 8, 2008