Rick Sikma on Drugs

Republican Senate Challenger

Zero Tolerance on drug laws

Q: Do you support or oppose the policy: "Drug use is immoral: enforce laws against it"?

A: STRONGLY SUPPORT: Since illegal drug use does, in fact, undermine the morals of society, public education must continue about its dangers. The negative mindset of illegal drug use will increase with education. Just as cigarette smoking in public was the "thing to do" in the 60's and 70's, education has shifted the way it is viewed today. Furthermore, those who act as suppliers of illegal drugs are also acting as the source of undermining morality, and therefore the penalties allowed by law need to be stiffened significantly with a mindset of Zero Tolerance.

Source: Email interview on 2008 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org Jun 2, 2008

Click here for definitions & background information on Drugs. Click here for a profile of Rick Sikma. Click here for SenateMatch answers by Rick Sikma. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Drugs in The Forum. Click here for a summary of Rick Sikma's positions on all issues. Click here for issue positions of other AK politicians.
*Other candidates on Drugs:*		*Rick Sikma on other issues:*
*AK Gubernatorial:* Sarah Palin *AK Senatorial:* Dave Cuddy Lisa Murkowski Mark Begich Ted Stevens Vic Vickers *2008 Senate retirements:* Wayne Allard(R,CO) Larry Craig(R,ID) Pete Domenici(R,NM) Chuck Hagel(R,NE) Trent Lott(R,MS) Craig Thomas(R,WY) John Warner(R,VA) *2008 Presidential Contenders:* Chuck Baldwin(C) Rep.Bob Barr(L) Sen.Hillary Clinton(D) Sen.Mike Gravel(L) Alan Keyes(C) Sen.John McCain(R) Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G) Ralph Nader(I) Sen.Barack Obama(D) Rep.Ron Paul(R)	*2008 Senate Races:* AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma AL:Sessions v.Figures AR:Pryor v.Kennedy CO:Schaffer v.Udall DE:Biden v.O`Donnell GA:Chambliss v.Martin v.Buckley IA:Harkin v.Reed ID:Risch v.LaRocco v.Rammell IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery KY:McConnell v.Lunsford LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy MA:Kerry v.Beatty v.Underwood ME:Collins v.Allen MI:Levin v.Hoogendyk v.Boman v.Nikitin MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Barkley v.Cavlan MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove MS6:Cochran v.Fleming MT:Baucus v.Kelleher NC:Dole v.Hagan NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Larrick NH:Sununu v.Shaheen v.Blevens NJ:Lautenberg v.Zimmer Pearce v.Udall OK:Inhofe v.Rice OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Brownlow RI:Reed v.Young v.Tingle SC:Graham v.Conley v.McBride SD:Johnson v.Dykstra TN:Alexander v.Tuke v.Lugo v.Heyward TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson VA:Gilmore v.Warner WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe WY4:Barrasso v.Carter WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators House of Representatives SenateMatch (matching quiz) Senate Votes (analysis) House Votes Bill Sponsorships Affiliations Policy Reports Group Ratings

Page last updated: Sep 28, 2008