Steve Novick on Social Security

Democratic Challenger

Stop borrowing from Trust Fund; deliver promised benefits

If Social Security had been left alone, it would be on sound financial footing for decades to come. But every President since 1983--except for Bill Clinton in his second term--has borrowed from that trust fund to pay for other programs. The real threat t Social Security is not that the system itself is 'broken'; it is the prospect that the rest of the Federal government will not repay what it has borrowed. Tough fiscal choices will have to be made to ensure that promised benefits will be delivered. Source: Campaign website, www.novickforsenate.org, "Issues" Apr 4, 2008

Click here for definitions & background information on Social Security. Click here for a profile of Steve Novick. Click here for SenateMatch answers by Steve Novick. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Social Security in The Forum. Click here for a summary of Steve Novick's positions on all issues. Click here for issue positions of other OR politicians.
*Other candidates on Social Security:*		*Steve Novick on other issues:*
*OR Gubernatorial:* Ted Kulongoski *OR Senatorial:* Gordon Harold Smith Jeff Merkley John Frohnmayer Ron Wyden *2008 Senate retirements:* Wayne Allard(R,CO) Larry Craig(R,ID) Pete Domenici(R,NM) Chuck Hagel(R,NE) Trent Lott(R,MS) Craig Thomas(R,WY) John Warner(R,VA) *2008 Presidential Contenders:* Chuck Baldwin(C) Rep.Bob Barr(L) Sen.Hillary Clinton(D) Sen.Mike Gravel(L) Alan Keyes(C) Sen.John McCain(R) Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G) Ralph Nader(I) Sen.Barack Obama(D) Rep.Ron Paul(R)	*2008 Senate Races:* AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma AL:Sessions v.Figures AR:Pryor v.Kennedy CO:Schaffer v.Udall DE:Biden v.O`Donnell GA:Chambliss v.Cardwell v.Jones v.Buckley IA:Harkin v.Reed ID:Risch v.LaRocco IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery KY:McConnell v.Lunsford LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy MA:Kerry v.O`Reilly v.Beatty ME:Collins v.Allen MI:Levin v.Hoogendyk MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Ventura v.Cavlan v.Pallmeyer MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove MS6:Cochran v.Fleming MT:Baucus v.Kelleher NC:Dole v.Hagan NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Raimondo NH:Sununu v.Shaheen NJ:Lautenberg v.Zimmer NM:Wilson v.Pearce v.Udall OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Frohnmayer OK:Inhofe v.Rice RI:Reed SC:Graham v.Cone v.Conley v.McBride SD:Johnson v.Dykstra TN:Alexander v.Eaton v.Padgett v.Tuke v.Lugo TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson VA:Gilmore v.Warner v.Marshall WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe WY4:Barrasso v.Carter v.Goodenough WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators House of Representatives SenateMatch (matching quiz) Senate Votes (analysis) House Votes Bill Sponsorships Affiliations Policy Reports Group Ratings

Page last updated: 3/31/2008