Pushed "Marissa's Law"--tougher penalties for sex predators
I called a special session of the legislature [after a referendum vote]. A 16-year old girl, Marissa Mathy-Zvaifler, had been killed at a concert in Albuquerque. The man charged with the crime had previously raped a 4-year-old girl, & upon conviction, wa
given probation instead of prison. There would be no serious disagreement here, given the public outrage, & there was not. Marissa's Law, as I insisted it be called, which included much tougher penalties for sexual predators, was passed overwhelmingly.
Source: Between Worlds, by Bill Richardson, p.320-321
Nov 3, 2005
Toughened DWI and sex offender laws
We toughened DWI and sex offender laws by passing stronger penalties. DWI is a non-partisan crisis in New Mexico, and the human toll cuts across party lines, ethnicity, economic status - it is devastating, and unacceptable. I propose multiple DWI
offenders forfeit their vehicles-let's take the weapons out of their hands. My DWI package contains stronger penalties for those who drive drunk with children in the car. And there are new, serious penalties for those who provide alcohol to our children.
Source: State of the State speech to the New Mexico Legislature
Jan 20, 2004
Domestic violence incidents start with drinking
Our problems with alcohol abuse aren't limited to DWI. Experts report the majority of domestic violence incidents start with, or are exacerbated by drinking. That's why my proposals incorporate domestic violence into increased training for law
enforcement officers, tougher penalties for offenders, and increasing treatment options to deal with the underlying problems. I also want to amend our stalking and harassment laws to prohibit electronic, or "cyber" stalking.
Source: State of the State speech to the New Mexico Legislature
Jan 20, 2004
Mandatory jail time, especially for repeat offenders
I have already made several crime-related proposals, including ones to deal with:
Child Safety
DWI
Domestic Violence
Sexual Assault
Victim Rights
Each time, I have proposed new, tough penalties-including mandatory jail time and
treatment-especially for repeat offenders. The core of my philosophy is that we must hold people responsible for their actions. When an individual breaks the law, we need to respond with an appropriate consequence.
Source: Campaign web site, RichardsonForGovernor.com, "Priorities"
Oct 24, 2002
Supports death penalty: zero tolerance for heinous crimes
I am in favor of NM's death penalty law. It sends a strong message of zero tolerance for heinous crimes, and it provides certain justice for the victim's families.
At the same time, we must ensure that capital punishment is applied equally, without
regard for race or economic status, & we must work to apply DNA testing to make sure only the guilty are executed.
I support the proposal to make the murder of a child under 11 years old an "aggravating circumstance" and eligible for the death penalty.
Source: Campaign web site, RichardsonForGovernor.com, "Priorities"
Oct 24, 2002
Impose "truth in sentencing" for violent criminals
Indicate which principles you support to address crime.
Broaden use of the death penalty for federal crimes.
Impose "truth in sentencing" for violent criminals so they serve full sentences with no chance of parole.
Limit the number of
appeals allowed to inmates on death row.
Fund programs to provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related skills.
Expand funding for community policing programs.
Prosecute youths accused of murder as adults.
Source: 1996 Congressional National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 1996
Voted NO on maintaining right of habeas corpus in Death Penalty Appeals.
Vote on an amendment to delete provisions in the bill that would make it harder for prisoners who have been given the death penalty in state courts to appeal the decision on constitutional grounds in the federal courts ['Habeas Corpus'].
Voted YES on making federal death penalty appeals harder.
Vote on a bill to make it harder for prisoners who have been given the death penalty in state courts to appeal the decision on constitutional grounds in the federal courts.
