A: The first priority of the next president is to be a president of all the US. We've got to quit even fighting among ourselves as conservatives and as Republicans, and start putting the better interest of our nation.
If that doesn't happen, we'll get none of these things done. We've got to be the united people of the US, and a president has got to somehow remind us that we are a great, resilient nation that has to stick together to solve all of these problems.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican Debate
Dec 12, 2007
Allow DC residents to vote on getting Representatives
Q: Do you support giving the District of Columbia voting representation?
A: I believe that the people of DC should be able to vote for representation. That's appropriate for the simple reason of equality & justice. If we need to amend the Constitution
to make that possible, it should happen. I don't care what color they are, I don't care how they vote--they ought to be able to vote, and their color & their political affiliation ought to have nothing to do with the equality that we should give them.
Source: 2007 GOP Presidential Forum at Morgan State University
Sep 27, 2007
Require photo ID for voting, to avoid fraud
Q: Are you concerned that some eligible voters will be denied the right to vote simply because they don't have a driver's license?
A: I have to show photo ID to get on an airplane in my home town. I think it's not asking too much to make sure that
people who are voting are truly eligible voters. When you register to vote, let's take your picture, and put it on a card. That way it doesn't dilute the vote if a lot of people who aren't registered voters try to fraudulently vote.
Source: 2007 GOP Presidential Forum at Morgan State University
Sep 27, 2007
Ok if church identifies candidates who favor its principles
Q: My church is currently under IRS investigation for "political involvement" due to my identifying politicians who support the destruction of innocent unborn children. Would you remove the gag rule from pastors like me & repeal the restrictions against
churches from expressing our biblical convictions for or against a candidate?
HUCKABEE: Yes.
TANCREDO: Yes.
COX: Yes. Let's get rid of the entire IRS while we're at it.
Attacking others' integrity reflects people's own immorality
I agree with the writer who said that "character is the person you are when no one is looking." It's the person you are when the cameras are off, the witnesses gone, and there's no one to keep score.
I think we are all performers to some extent.
But the real person is the one who is nearly the same behind closed doors as the public eye. We might say, "I'd never steal with someone watching me." But would we steal if no one was watching?
It seems that the desire to see public officials fail the
integrity test is at an all-time high. The reason is that by showing the flaws in other people, the public affirms that its own inadequacies are not so abnormal. As the character of America begins to plummet, we want to justify our own lack of morality
by somehow showing that everyone is just as bad.
Our generation has learned to hold to the standard of each other instead of the standard of God. That is the travesty: God is no longer the standard; we are.
Govern by "Regnat Populus," AR's motto "The People Rule"
You are entitled to ask, "What kind of governor will you be?" I plan to be guided by certain principles that will form the basis of policies enabling every Arkansas citizen to claim our state truly as the "Land of Opportunity."
Those of us elected
or employed to serve the citizen need to remember who the boss is
Government should not penalize productivity and subsidize irresponsibility
Let us establish policies for the family
I believe that a good leader never asks of others what one is
unwilling to do himself
Government should welcome the participation of citizens from the private sector
I believe the best government is the most local government
In education, we cannot ignore the need for building character
Government
should facilitate rather than complicate life for those who create jobs by running a business.
Our tax policies should be fair to those who work hard for paychecks.
We must always keep in mind our state motto: Regnat Populus ("The People Rule").
Q: What mistakes do you see in the Bush administration?
A: I want to make sure that we went to a place where the states had more power and not centralized in the federal government. That's been a mistake of this administration,
I think an honest and sincere one, but a huge mistake. And instead, we need to honor the Tenth Amendment, we need to remember that we are a nation of strong states and weak federal government, not strong federal centralized government and weak states.
Source: 2007 GOP primary debate, at Reagan library, hosted by MSNBC
May 3, 2007
Supprts term limits for state legislators
Q Do you support the current two-term eight-year limit for Arkansas governors?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support two-term eight-year limit for Arkansas state senators?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support the three-term six-year limit for Arkansas house representatives?
A: Yes.
Q:
Source: 2002 AR Gubernatorial National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 2002
Limit campaign contributions, but no public funding
Q: Do you support limiting individual contributions to state candidates?
A: Yes
Q: For PAC contributions?
A: Yes.
Q: For Corporate contributions?
A: Yes.
Q: For Political Parties?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support requiring full and timely
disclosure of campaign finance information?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support imposing spending limits on state level political campaigns?
A: No.
Q: Do you support partial funding from state taxes for state level political campaigns?
A: No.
Source: 2002 AR Gubernatorial National Political Awareness Test
Nov 1, 2002
Not more government, but more efficient government
I don’t think we need a lot more government. We need the government we have to work more efficiently. We need it to work in ways that help our citizens rather than helping us to just grow more government. And, if the economy is slowing, then that’s all
the more reason not to launch forth with a whole lot of new government programs but rather to scale back everywhere we can except for determining those things which we cannot scale back and then carrying out our responsibilities.
Source: State of the State address to the Arkansas legislature
Jan 9, 2001
Disclose political gifts, but don't prohibit them
Public officials are confronted with rules on the giving and receiving of gifts. I think it's a good idea to disclose to the public the types and scope of gifts. Voters should be able to evaluate the relationships
that those in public office have and decide whether the givers are exerting too much influence.
But the trend in many states is to regulate and even prohibit normal giving and receiving among friends and relatives.
These rules often are made by those who don't understand that true giving is not about seeking to influence someone. In the true spirit of giving, the person who received the gift is not so much obligated to return the favor as he
is to pass on a similar blessing to another. Thus, this transaction becomes an ever-expanding circle of compassion and generosity.
Negative campaigning works with some voters but not with God
Living life for the ultimate--living beyond our lifetime--requires that we think not in terms of getting rid of those who oppose us. Instead, we should overcome them with superior ideas and values.
My family has had to endure attacks I never would have imagined before running for office. Frivolous lawsuits instigated by political opponents who are unable to find real issues can create distractions.
Some members of the media are willing to take baseless allegations and not only report them but repeat them over and over.
Although attacking others will sometimes work with voters, it will not work as we stand before God's judgment seat. He will judge based on what he knows, not on what our critics have said about us.
Decide based on next generation, not next election
No matter how idealistic a person is when entering the political arena, I can attest there's always a temptation to make decisions that will affect the next election rather than chart the best course for the next generation. It's easy to justify such an
attitude by telling yourself that if you don't get reelected, you won't be able to have an impact. Our society increasingly demands measurable results in a short time.
The longer I serve as governor, the more I remind myself that my most important
decisions are not those that will affect the next election. They are those that will affect the next generation. If public officials had fought for generational programs 50 years ago, my state might not be one of the poorest in the country.
As we work
raise our children, and make daily decisions, we need to ask if they are for the immediate or for the ultimate good. Imagine the difference if we made decisions based on how they impacted the next generation rather than influenced the next election.
Term limits counter election skewed laws toward incumbents
I strongly advocate a constitutional amendment that would limit the terms of members of Congress. Election laws are skewed in favor of the incumbents. The power of incumbency is reflected in the franking privilege, the use of staff paid for by the
taxpayers to do research, the advantage of media attention that is given to incumbents over challengers, and the ability of incumbents to come home at strategic times to announce various projects in order to continue the "aura" of the office.
I would personally favor that no one be elected to the US Senate for more than two six-year terms, and that no one be elected to the Congress for more than three four-year terms.
As one who is attempting to challenge a long-term incumbent, it has
become increasingly apparent that the current process is not adequate to remove members of Congress. Since we already limit the President to eight years, it seems ridiculous to give Congressmen and Senators long-term careers at taxpayer expense.
Change House terms to 4 years, to avoid constant campaigning
Changing the House of Representatives' term to four years from the current two-year term would give a Congressman more time on the job and less time having to campaign for reelection. It would also be possible to make the four-year terms of
Congressmen fall in the middle of the presidential election cycle, which might be helpful in balancing the attention given to the various races taking place at any given time.
Source: Responses to Associated Press Questionnaire for AR Senate
Nov 1, 1992
Won't vote for pay raise for myself as member of Congress
I would not vote for a pay raise for myself as a member of Congress as our incumbent has done on at least four occasions. There needs to be radical reform in the scandalous manner in which pay and perks are handled.
With the enactment of a term-limitation act, the class of Congress that is ending its term should work with an independent commission to evaluate whether or not any adjustment in salaries should be considered for the next Congress.
Source: Responses to Associated Press Questionnaire for AR Senate
Nov 1, 1992
Reforms must respect state's rights to select electors.
Huckabee adopted the National Governors Association position paper:
The Issue
In the wake of the United States presidential election in Florida, the Congress and the administration has expressed interest in federal standards for elections. Recognizing that Articles I and II of the United States Constitution grants states, not Congress, the authority to determine the manner of selecting presidential electors and conducting elections generally, most legislative proposals do not mandate federal standards. Rather, current proposals direct federal agencies or commissions to study and make recommendations concerning the election system. Nonetheless, the possibility of legislation in the 107th Congress requiring states to implement federal election standards remains. If enacted without adequate funding by the federal government, such legislation could also result in an unfunded mandate to the states.
NGA’s Position
Articles I and II of the United States Constitution grant states the authority to determine the manner of selecting presidential electors and provide that states are responsible for establishing election procedures generally. However, in the wake of the 2000 presidential election, the nation’s Governors recognize the need for election reform. NGA will continue to monitor federal legislation addressing this issue, but has not taken a position in support of or opposition to election reform efforts.
Source: National Governors Association "Issues / Positions" 01-NGA11 on Aug 1, 2001
